Horripilant PC requirements, FPS and best settings

Quick answer: can your PC run Horripilant?

Difficulty profile: how hard is Horripilant to run?

How this game ranks among 937 modelled titles, and what that means for different classes of graphics card.

Across the 937 games we have modelled, Horripilant lands on a demand score of 4, ahead of 0% of them. In plain terms it is a light game for graphics hardware.

It comes from the minimum card on the Steam page (Integrated graphics with full Vulkan 1.0 support), which we map onto a common performance scale and convert to 1080p High. Treat it as a relative guide.

What it means by card class

• RTX 5090, our example of an enthusiast card, hits close to 253 FPS at 1080p and 253 FPS at 1440p, so you will not need to tune much.
• On a mid-range card, the RTX 5070, expect the frame rate to be capped by the game or CPU: roughly 253 FPS at 1080p, 253 FPS at 1440p.
• On an entry card, the RTX 5060, expect the frame rate to be capped by the game or CPU: roughly 253 FPS at 1080p, 253 FPS at 1440p.
• An RTX 5080 (a high-end card) has more power than Horripilant can use, landing near 253 FPS at 1080p and 253 FPS at 1440p.

Processor demand is rated separately: Horripilant scores 32 on our CPU scale, higher than 47% of the games we model.

Horripilant system requirements

Official minimum and recommended specs for Horripilant, translated into frame rates.

These are the developer figures on Steam, and patches can change them.

What the requirements mean in practice

The minimum card, Integrated graphics with full Vulkan 1.0 support, is the floor Steam sets. In our model it hits close to 147 FPS at 1080p on Low settings, and 81 FPS if you push it to High.

The publisher gives a minimum specification and nothing higher, so we model Horripilant from the minimum card. That makes the estimates more approximate than usual.

You will need 2 GB RAM of RAM at minimum or 2 GB RAM to match the recommended spec, plus 400 MB available space on your drive.

Which graphics card do you need for Horripilant?

Pick a target and see the card it needs in Horripilant.

For 1080p at 60 FPS on High, GTX 1060 6GB is the entry point in our list, with RTX 5050 the first RTX 50 card that clears it.

At 1440p the entry card for 60 FPS on High is the GTX 1060 6GB, with the RTX 5050 leading the RTX 50 line.

Native 4K is a tall order, so assume upscaling. The RTX 5050 is the first RTX 50 card to hit 60 FPS on High that way.

Cards across NVIDIA, AMD and Intel are included. For a personal answer with your own CPU and RAM, use the can my PC run it checker, or see whether your processor limits you in the bottleneck checker.

Estimated Horripilant FPS on 28 graphics cards

Estimated frame rates for 28 graphics cards from NVIDIA, AMD and Intel. Pick a resolution to redraw the bars.

Compare the extremes: an RTX 5090 gets close to 253 FPS at 1440p and 253 FPS at 4K, and an RTX 5050 around 253 FPS at 1440p. That is the span of results you can expect in Horripilant.

Full results table

Every figure assumes High settings paired with a quick CPU. The last two columns use Quality upscaling (DLSS, FSR or XeSS, if the game offers it). Figures above 360 FPS are shown as 360+. Compare two cards directly in the GPU comparison tool.

Card by card verdicts for Horripilant

Twelve popular cards, with a plain-English verdict for each.

Verdicts below use High settings throughout. For older cards a weak result mostly means lowering the preset, since Low and Medium settings recover a lot of speed in our model.

The step from an RTX 5060 (253 FPS at 1440p) to an RTX 5070 (253 FPS) is around 0% in our model, a useful yardstick when choosing between the two.

Resolution playbook for Horripilant: 1080p, 1440p and 4K

Settings that hold 60 FPS at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, worked out for this game.

1080p playbook

1080p is straightforward on GTX 1660 Super, RTX 3060 12GB, RTX 4060, which hold 60 FPS on High natively here, so you only need upscaling for extra smoothness.

Pick your card in the table for the preset and upscaling mode that keep 1080p above 60 FPS.

1440p playbook

Native 1440p works on RTX 4060, RTX 5060, RTX 5070, all above 60 FPS on High in our model. Upscaling then becomes optional rather than required.

Pick your card in the table for the preset and upscaling mode that keep 1440p above 60 FPS.

4K playbook

For 4K play, RTX 5070 Ti, RTX 4080 Super, RTX 5080 clear 60 FPS on High without any upscaling in our estimates, which leaves room to raise individual settings.

Start from the preset that still manages 60 FPS, then raise one setting at a time. The table gives the best preset for each card.

Stepping up the RTX 50 range in Horripilant

What each step up the RTX 50 range adds at 1440p with High settings.

Our model finds the best value step at RTX 5050 to RTX 5060, close to 0% faster at 1440p, and the weakest at RTX 5050 to RTX 5060, around 0%.

Faster cards help less here than in heavier games. Horripilant runs out of graphics work early, so the CPU becomes the limit.

Compare options directly in the upgrade value calculator or the GPU price to performance calculator.

Horripilant VRAM requirements

Modelled VRAM use at High settings. Running short causes stutter even on a fast GPU.

Expect roughly 2 GB of VRAM at 1080p, 2.6 GB at 1440p and 3.6 GB at 4K on High. Remember that this is an estimate derived from the recommended graphics card.

Dropping texture quality is the quickest way to save memory: stepping from High to Medium trims the estimate to close to 2.2 GB at 1440p.

Budget tiers: 6, 8, 12 and 16 GB cards

• With 6 GB the verdict is comfortable at 1080p, comfortable at 1440p and comfortable at 4K on High. Where it is short, Medium textures and upscaling are the practical fixes.
• An 8 GB card is comfortable at 1080p, comfortable at 1440p and comfortable at 4K on High. Where it is short, Medium textures and upscaling are the practical fixes.
• On a 12 GB card, 1080p is comfortable, 1440p is comfortable and 4K is comfortable on High. Memory is rarely a worry at these settings.
• A 16 GB card is comfortable at 1080p, comfortable at 1440p and comfortable at 4K on High. Memory is rarely a worry at these settings.

Run your own numbers in the VRAM calculator and see how much VRAM you need for gaming.

Horripilant processor guide

Which processors keep a fast graphics card busy in this game.

Steam names Any x86_64 CPU as the minimum processor and Any x86_64 CPU as the recommended one. The table shows the most frames each chip can prepare in our model, regardless of graphics settings.

With a CPU score of 32, Horripilant is neither light nor heavy on processors. A current mid-range chip is a good fit.

A Core i5-12400F tops out near 139 FPS in Horripilant in our estimates, a handy line to compare against your card.

Test your own pairing in the bottleneck checker and read system bottlenecks guide.

CPU and GPU pairings for Horripilant

Does the CPU or the GPU set the pace? Seven example builds.

Not every pairing is balanced. 7 of the seven below are held back by the processor at 1440p, starting with RTX 4060 plus Core i3-12100F (CPU ceiling near 106 FPS against close to 360+ FPS of graphics power).

The best-balanced pairing is the RTX 5090 with Ryzen 7 9800X3D: its processor ceiling (close to 291 FPS) sits close to what the card can draw (around 360+ FPS) at 1440p, so neither part is wasted.

None of these is a shopping list. They show how the balance shifts as you move up the range, and the bottleneck checker lets you try your own pair.

RAM and storage for Horripilant

RAM and disk space from the Steam page, with a practical view.

Memory first. Steam sets 2 GB RAM as the minimum and 2 GB RAM as the recommended amount. With Windows, a browser and a chat app open, 16 GB leaves comfortable headroom.

The install asks for roughly 0 GB. Downloading it takes around 1 min at 100 Mbps and close to 0 min at 500 Mbps, allowing for overhead.

There is no SSD requirement on the page, but faster storage never hurts.

Size your memory with the RAM calculator: it adds Windows, a browser and any streaming to the game's own needs. Check how long the install takes with the download time calculator.

Horripilant best graphics settings

A starting point for several popular cards. Cells list the highest-quality preset that keeps 60 FPS.

The table gives the best-looking setup that still holds 60 FPS in Horripilant for each card and resolution.

• Reach for upscaling first. It gives up little detail for a large frame-rate gain. Pick the highest quality mode that hits your target.
• Adjust a single setting at once and watch the frame rate, so you know which setting did the work.
• Then trim the costliest options. Shadows, volumetric effects and draw distance usually cost the most, if the game offers them.
• Do not cut textures first if you have the VRAM. They cost little speed. Our estimate for this game is 2.6 GB at 1440p.
• Set a frame cap to match your display and keep the PC cooler, and check the VRR and frame cap calculator for a sensible figure.

An upscaler is assumed throughout; confirm the game has one in its graphics options. Get a personal recommendation in the best settings generator, or compare modes in the DLSS and frame generation estimator.

Horripilant on gaming laptops

Estimated FPS on RTX 50 laptop GPUs at typical power limits.

At typical power limits, RTX 5050 Laptop, RTX 5060 Laptop, RTX 5070 Laptop, RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, RTX 5080 Laptop, RTX 5090 Laptop reach 60 FPS at 1080p on High in our model, and RTX 5050 Laptop, RTX 5060 Laptop, RTX 5070 Laptop, RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, RTX 5080 Laptop, RTX 5090 Laptop also manage 1440p.

A laptop GPU is only as fast as the power and cooling its maker allows. Look for the TGP in the spec sheet before relying on any estimate.

Try different wattages in the laptop TGP estimator.

What to watch for in Horripilant

General guidance for this kind of game, chosen from the Steam genres and features.

Steam gives Horripilant under Casual, Indie, RPG, so these general tips apply. They are hedged guidance rather than facts about the game's engine.

• Large builds, towns or factories can push memory and processor use up over time, so leave some headroom beyond the stated minimum.
• Full controller support is listed, so playing from the sofa on a TV is an option, where 60 FPS is usually the sensible target.
• Long role-playing sessions reward stable settings, so pick a preset you can leave alone rather than tuning mid-game.
• Because the load is light, a frame cap and power-saving settings are worth more than extra graphics options.
• Indie games vary widely in how well they are optimised, so patch notes and community reports can say more than hardware specs.

Screenshots of Horripilant

A look at Horripilant from the official Steam gallery. Visual detail is what you trade away when you drop presets, so it helps to see what you are keeping.

Screenshots and artwork are promotional images from the Horripilant Steam store page and belong to Alexandre Declos , Pas Game Studio and Black Lantern Collective.

If you like Horripilant: similar games to check

Other guides from this collection.

These guides sit closest to Horripilant in our data, either because they share genres or because they are about as hard to run. The demand scores use one common scale.

• Moonlight Peaks: demand score 8 against 4 for Horripilant, so it is heavier on graphics. Shared genres: Casual, Indie, RPG, Simulation.
• Silly Linguine Cat Simulator Deluxe Online scores 4 on the same scale (Horripilant scores 4), which makes it about as demanding. Shared genres: Casual, Indie, RPG, Simulation.
• Little Witch in the Woods: demand score 4 against 4 for Horripilant, so it is about as demanding. Shared genres: Casual, Indie, RPG, Simulation.
• Tiny Bookshop: 15 on our demand scale, heavier than Horripilant. Shared genres: Casual, Indie, RPG, Simulation.
• Kabuto Park scores 4 on the same scale (Horripilant scores 4), which makes it about as demanding. Shared genres: Casual, Indie, RPG, Simulation.
• Keep Driving: demand score 4 against 4 for Horripilant, so it is about as demanding. Shared genres: Casual, Indie, RPG, Simulation.
• Hello Kitty Island Adventure sits at 8 for graphics demand and is heavier than Horripilant (4). Shared genres: Casual, Indie, RPG, Simulation.
• With a demand score of 8, Matchmaking Inc. is heavier than Horripilant. Shared genres: Casual, Indie, RPG, Simulation.

Horripilant: facts and Steam features

On Steam the game sits at Very Positive: 91% positive across 1,854 reviews at the time of checking (2026-11-02). Larger communities tend to share more settings guides and fixes.

The game is out for close to 9 months. Updates from Alexandre Declos , Pas Game Studio and new graphics drivers can both change how it runs, so revisit your settings occasionally.

Steam features

Facts come from the public Steam store page. We have not benchmarked every card, so treat the frame rates on this page as modelled estimates.

Method: where the Horripilant numbers come from

A short, honest note on how the numbers are produced.

For Horripilant the demand score of 4 comes from the minimum graphics card, the CPU score of 32 from an assumed processor line, and the VRAM figure of 2 GB at 1080p High is estimated from the demand score.

In short: card performance divided by game demand, adjusted for resolution, preset and upscaling, reduced when VRAM is short and capped by processor speed.

These are modelled estimates, not benchmarks. Real results change with drivers, patches, cooling, the scene you play and your processor. Use the numbers to compare cards and settings, then check them in the game.

Horripilant FAQ

The questions players ask most about Horripilant on PC.

Free tools to check Horripilant on your hardware